diff options
| author | Robert McQueen <robot101@debian.org> | 2006-06-07 00:03:57 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Robert McQueen <robot101@debian.org> | 2006-06-07 00:03:57 +0000 |
| commit | bc4bb30c8ff5b07ce4452b5e6cbd95a4c710d3c3 (patch) | |
| tree | f055608ea1fefe214797e58c1c5d4bdf698f67e8 /ChangeLog | |
| parent | fb41330d662740d1bf41de4e8bcd96db240137fc (diff) | |
2005-05-06 Robert McQueen <robot101@debian.org>
* glib/dbus-gvalue-utils.c: Fix the failing test where static string
pointers were put into a GPtrArray-based specialised collection, and
then freed along with the array. GValues which you add into
collections or maps which have the NOCOPY flag set are assumed to not
belong to the caller, so rather than the existing pointer-stealing
semantics, they are copied instead. Given that the main consumers of
this abstraction are the bindings themselves, I don't think this is
too bad, but others should watch their choice of take vs set_static.
Diffstat (limited to 'ChangeLog')
| -rw-r--r-- | ChangeLog | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -1,5 +1,16 @@ 2005-05-06 Robert McQueen <robot101@debian.org> + * glib/dbus-gvalue-utils.c: Fix the failing test where static string + pointers were put into a GPtrArray-based specialised collection, and + then freed along with the array. GValues which you add into + collections or maps which have the NOCOPY flag set are assumed to not + belong to the caller, so rather than the existing pointer-stealing + semantics, they are copied instead. Given that the main consumers of + this abstraction are the bindings themselves, I don't think this is + too bad, but others should watch their choice of take vs set_static. + +2005-05-06 Robert McQueen <robot101@debian.org> + * glib/dbus-gvalue-utils.c: Spotted a warning about the return value of g_slist_prepend not being used. Fixed copying of slist-based specialised collections, then wrote a test case and found that it was |