summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/dbus-specification.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHavoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>2003-10-14 22:16:03 +0000
committerHavoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>2003-10-14 22:16:03 +0000
commit3251264ac483680b4a5fe808729f7e3b34f41fd4 (patch)
tree0b2a953be7b1a858c5759158e834de3d2d1b763e /doc/dbus-specification.xml
parentb704a068a92c00b50e7d5f33ef6c8e1c3a87ceae (diff)
2003-10-14 Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>
* bus/bus.c (bus_context_check_security_policy): revamp this to work more sanely with new policy-based requested reply setup * bus/connection.c (bus_transaction_send_from_driver): set bus driver messages as no reply * bus/policy.c (bus_client_policy_check_can_receive): handle a requested_reply attribute on allow/deny rules * bus/system.conf: add <allow requested_reply="true"/> * bus/driver.c (bus_driver_handle_message): fix check for replies sent to the bus driver, which was backward. How did this ever work at all though? I think I'm missing something. * dbus/dbus-message.c (decode_header_data): require error and method return messages to have a reply serial field to be valid (_dbus_message_loader_queue_messages): break up this function; validate that reply serial and plain serial are nonzero; clean up the OOM/error handling. (get_uint_field): don't return -1 from this (dbus_message_create_header): fix signed/unsigned bug * bus/connection.c (bus_connections_expect_reply): save serial of the incoming message, not reply serial
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/dbus-specification.xml')
-rw-r--r--doc/dbus-specification.xml5
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/dbus-specification.xml b/doc/dbus-specification.xml
index 698e35a2..807769b7 100644
--- a/doc/dbus-specification.xml
+++ b/doc/dbus-specification.xml
@@ -645,6 +645,11 @@
was successfully processed.
</para>
<para>
+ The METHOD_RETURN or ERROR reply message MUST have the REPLY_SERIAL
+ header field. If this field is missing, it should be treated as
+ a corrupt message.
+ </para>
+ <para>
If a METHOD_CALL message has the flag NO_REPLY_EXPECTED,
then as an optimization the application receiving the method
call may choose to omit the reply message (regardless of