diff options
author | Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> | 2006-11-18 03:21:50 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com> | 2006-11-18 03:21:50 +0000 |
commit | 6c2620f242f691db3b80543af36af9432bb2c9b7 (patch) | |
tree | 52403c4ee38159712968909b984f405cd2613a70 /doc | |
parent | d3204dc446d96876baab9859de132a5a4da675d4 (diff) |
2006-11-17 Havoc Pennington <hp@redhat.com>
* doc/dbus-faq.xml: minor FAQ tweaks
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/dbus-faq.xml | 19 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/doc/dbus-faq.xml b/doc/dbus-faq.xml index 07324049..69ac3f15 100644 --- a/doc/dbus-faq.xml +++ b/doc/dbus-faq.xml @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ <article id="index"> <articleinfo> <title>D-Bus FAQ</title> - <releaseinfo>Version 0.2</releaseinfo> - <date>07 November 2006</date> + <releaseinfo>Version 0.3</releaseinfo> + <date>17 November 2006</date> <authorgroup> <author> <firstname>Havoc</firstname> @@ -304,6 +304,11 @@ </question> <answer> <para> + Keep in mind, it is not only an IPC system; it also includes + lifecycle tracking, service activation, security policy, and other + higher-level structure and assumptions. + </para> + <para> The best place to start is to read the D-Bus <ulink url="dbus-tutorial.html">tutorial</ulink>, so you have a concrete idea what D-Bus actually is. If you understand other protocols on a wire format level, you @@ -315,7 +320,7 @@ for some specific use cases. Thus, it probably isn't tuned for what you want to do, unless you are doing the things D-Bus was designed for. Don't make the mistake of thinking - that any system labeled "IPC" is the same thing. + that any system involving "IPC" is the same thing. </para> <para> The D-Bus authors would not recommend using D-Bus @@ -621,14 +626,18 @@ If you're writing a desktop application for UNIX, then D-Bus is of course our recommendation for talking to other parts of the desktop session. - (With the caveat that you should use a stable release - of D-Bus; until we reach 1.0, there isn't a stable release.) + </para> + <para> + D-Bus is also designed for communications between system daemons and + communications between the desktop and system daemons. </para> <para> If you're doing something complicated such as clustering, distributed swarms, peer-to-peer, or whatever then the authors of this FAQ don't have expertise in these areas and you should ask someone else or try a search engine. + D-Bus is most likely a poor choice but could be appropriate + for some things. </para> <para> Note: the D-Bus mailing list is probably not the place to |