From 71a357de56ba38aae4c9a41931da40aa1cb9e116 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon McVittie Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:13:15 +0100 Subject: configure.in: *Actually* fix detection of i486 atomic ops. My previous attempt at a fix would always enable them due to wrong quoting. Patch from Colin Walters --- configure.in | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'configure.in') diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in index f5d4edc2..fccb1373 100644 --- a/configure.in +++ b/configure.in @@ -566,9 +566,9 @@ if test x"$GCC" = xyes; then esac fi fi -AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([DBUS_USE_ATOMIC_INT_486_COND], ["$have_atomic_inc_cond"], +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([DBUS_USE_ATOMIC_INT_486_COND], [$have_atomic_inc_cond], [Always defined; expands to 1 if we should use atomic integer implementation for 486, else 0]) -AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(DBUS_HAVE_ATOMIC_INT_COND, ["$have_atomic_inc_cond"], +AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(DBUS_HAVE_ATOMIC_INT_COND, [$have_atomic_inc_cond], [Always defined; expands to 1 if we have an atomic integer implementation, else 0]) #### Various functions -- cgit