From c2079d792c0eb8d2cbb8fdfcfc58302842a0a2d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lennart Poettering Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:29:36 +0100 Subject: shm: don't complain about missing SHM segments If two clients try to cleanup the SHM directory at the same time, they might want to open and then delete the same segment at the same time, in which case one client might win, the other one lose. In this case, don't warn about ENOENT. --- src/pulsecore/shm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/pulsecore/shm.c b/src/pulsecore/shm.c index 29849d57..5d5d85ab 100644 --- a/src/pulsecore/shm.c +++ b/src/pulsecore/shm.c @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ int pa_shm_attach_ro(pa_shm *m, unsigned id) { segment_name(fn, sizeof(fn), m->id = id); if ((fd = shm_open(fn, O_RDONLY, 0)) < 0) { - if (errno != EACCES) + if (errno != EACCES && errno != ENOENT) pa_log("shm_open() failed: %s", pa_cstrerror(errno)); goto fail; } -- cgit