From f29acfd0e0413a9bd126782763ee2dcf10357546 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wim Taymans Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 13:26:39 +0200 Subject: alsa: work around slightly broken _delay implementations Use snd_pcm_avail_delay() in pa_alsa_safe_delay() so that we can check the delay value against the avail value and patch it up when it looks invalid. Only do this for capture. --- src/modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src/modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c') diff --git a/src/modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c b/src/modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c index f8249440..14f08a56 100644 --- a/src/modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c +++ b/src/modules/alsa/alsa-sink.c @@ -802,7 +802,7 @@ static void update_smoother(struct userdata *u) { /* Let's update the time smoother */ - if (PA_UNLIKELY((err = pa_alsa_safe_delay(u->pcm_handle, &delay, u->hwbuf_size, &u->sink->sample_spec)) < 0)) { + if (PA_UNLIKELY((err = pa_alsa_safe_delay(u->pcm_handle, &delay, u->hwbuf_size, &u->sink->sample_spec, FALSE)) < 0)) { pa_log_warn("Failed to query DSP status data: %s", pa_alsa_strerror(err)); return; } -- cgit