From dfe27f623765b20bdaff2306109f89baca67d0cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lennart Poettering Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:29:36 +0100 Subject: shm: don't complain about missing SHM segments If two clients try to cleanup the SHM directory at the same time, they might want to open and then delete the same segment at the same time, in which case one client might win, the other one lose. In this case, don't warn about ENOENT. --- src/pulsecore/shm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'src') diff --git a/src/pulsecore/shm.c b/src/pulsecore/shm.c index fbf777a4..1e31d545 100644 --- a/src/pulsecore/shm.c +++ b/src/pulsecore/shm.c @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ int pa_shm_attach_ro(pa_shm *m, unsigned id) { segment_name(fn, sizeof(fn), m->id = id); if ((fd = shm_open(fn, O_RDONLY, 0)) < 0) { - if (errno != EACCES) + if (errno != EACCES && errno != ENOENT) pa_log("shm_open() failed: %s", pa_cstrerror(errno)); goto fail; } -- cgit